Extending the discussion on the issue of "over-abusing fungi, being backed by fungi"? Finally, through these three works, we can’t help but extend our reflection. In the hands of biological artists, these creatures seem to become a material that can be played with. Through reconstruction and reinterpretation, they are assembled into human voice props, but these creatures are still Another kind of life may also have intentions that humans cannot decipher. If we re-look at the process of art reconstruction from their perspective, whether the artist is playing with these creatures, or whether these creatures are playing with the artist's idea, tempting the artist to do this. What about project creation ?
Engagement: In what role whatsapp database should the audience enter bioart? In the end, even if biological artists can re-interpret important issues by playing with biological materials, they will inevitably face a decisive moment: how to let the audience contact this biological art? How to allow the audience to read and absorb the message that the bio-art creation wants to express? How to create an environment where the audience can extend the discussion, talk to each other, and reflect? Here, the author takes the “engagement” emphasized in design fiction as a benchmark, that is, whether the audience can transcend the third point of view of watching the movie, and then switch to the first point of view, as if walking into the situation.
The purpose is that when the audience watches from a third perspective and the attitude of a bystander, it will inevitably replace their own identity and become a "more decent, in line with current ethics and morals" appearance, and use a high-profile dialogue; however, when the audience is Only by being able to truly transform into the first perspective and feel or resonate in person can we trigger the most authentic response from the audience, and then have a real reflection, and only then can we really think about what the future you want will be (perferable future) (